In this lesson I want to state some of the reasons I left the Catholic Church. I do not wish to state
any of the personal experiences I had as result of leaving. I will mention, though, that I came from
a large, devout Catholic family of twelve children. I attended Trinity High School in Louisville,
Kentucky. At the time of my intense Scriptural study, I had two brothers who were enrolled in
Catholic seminaries studying to be priests. I also want to state I did not leave the Catholic Church
because of some evil that I had done or that was done to me. I left the Catholic Church because I
came to believe that it was contrary to the Bible. This I will endeavor to show in this study.
THE FIRST REASON I LEFT IS BECAUSE THE CATHOLICS DO NOT HAVE THE
RIGHT ATTITUDE TOWARD THE TRUTH.
To illustrate what I mean by this, I will explain the difference in the two sides. Those with the
right attitude toward the truth are always willing to test what they teach with others. They invite
those of opposite views to work together for truth and unity. They appreciate when those who
differ with them point out where they think they are wrong. They have everything thoroughly
tested, studying arguments both for and against, looking at both sides of the question.
Those with the wrong attitude toward the truth are not willing to test what they teach in fair and
open discussion, privately or publicly. They do not invite others to point out where they think they
are wrong, and do not appreciate when others try to do so. They won't allow their members to
hear both sides of an issue, and especially they don't want them to examine opposing arguments.
Hopefully, one can now understand what I mean when I said the Catholics do not have the right
attitude toward the truth. Catholics are not allowed, and especially are not encouraged to hear
both sides regarding truth and error. They are not to read books which differ from their doctrine.
Thus, they are encouraged by the clergy to be closed minded to anything which differs from
Catholicism. We ask, "Why don't Catholic officials encourage their members to examine opposing
Scriptural teaching?" False teachers have learned that when truth and error are examined side by
side, some begin to see the truth. False teachers are afraid of being exposed and of losing their
THE NEXT REASON I LEFT IS BECAUSE THE BIBLE ONLY IS THE ALL
SUFFICIENT GUIDE TO SALVATION, BUT THE CATHOLIC CHURCH TEACHES
THAT IT IS NOT.
The Catholic Catechism For Adults on page 52 says, "Can you learn to save your soul just by
reading the Bible? No, because certain things in the Bible can be misunderstood, and because the
Bible does not have everything God taught." Notice that the first part of their answer to "Can you
learn to save your soul just by reading the Bible?" is, "No..." However, their own translations of
the Bible teaches the opposite. All Scriptural quotations that I will be giving are from Catholic
translations. 2 Tim. 3:15-17 says, "And because from thy infancy thou hast known the holy
scriptures, which can instruct thee to salvation, by faith which is Christ Jesus. All scripture,
inspired of God, is profitable to teach, to reprove, to correct, to instruct in justice, that the man of
God may be perfect, furnished to every good work." Thus, the apostle Paul by the inspiration of
God, says to Timothy "thou hast known the holy scriptures, which can instruct thee to salvation"
and make you "perfect, furnished to every good work."
Rom. 1:16 says, "For I am not ashamed of the gospel. For it is the power of God unto salvation to
everyone that believeth, to the Jew first, and to the Greek. James 1:21 says, "...With meekness
receive the ingrafted word, which is able to save you souls." Consequently, the word contained in
the Bible is able to save our souls.
The next part of the answer in the Catechism to the question, "Can you learn to save your soul
just by the Bible?" is, "No, because certain things in the Bible can be misunderstood..." They are
implying that the Bible cannot be understood. John A. O'Brien, the Catholic author of the book,
"The Faith of Millions," is much more expressive when he says on page 152, "The Bible is not a
clear and intelligible guide to all..." The book, "The Faith of Millions" was given to me before
my conversion by my older brother Norman who was at the time a student at St. Meinrad
Seminary, St. Meinrad, Indiana.
The apostle Paul said we can understand what he wrote. "If yet, you have heard of the
dispensation of the grace of God which is given me towards you: how that, according to
revelation, the mystery has been made known to me, as I have written above in few words; as you
reading, may understand my knowledge in the mystery of Christ." (Eph. 3:2-4). Paul said the
mystery had been made know to him by the revelation of God. He then showed that he was
writing it e.g., "as I have written above in few words" (in the chapters prior to this) and "as you
reading, may understand my knowledge in the mystery of Christ." In other words, when we read
what he wrote, we can understand what he understood. Paul also said , "For we write nothing to
you that you do not read and understand" (2 Cor. 1:13) and "Therefore do not become foolish,
but understand what the will of the Lord is" (Eph. 5:17). Thus, the inspired writers taught that we
most certainly can understand the Scriptures.
The last part of the answer given in the Catechism to the question, "Can you learn to save your
soul just by reading the Bible?" was "No...because the Bible does not have everything God
taught." The Faith of Millions, on pages 153-154 says, "The Bible does not contain all the
teaching of the Christian religion, nor does it formulate all the duties of its members." The
Scriptures contain everything that is necessary to equip the man of God for every good work (2
Tim. 3:16-17). There is not a solitary good work that the Christian can do which is not provided
in the Scriptures. The Scriptural proof they give for the Bible not containing everything God
taught, is John 20:30. It says, "Many other signs also did Jesus in the sight of his disciples, which
are not written in this book." (See Catechism For Adults, p. 10).
In John 20:30, John simply said that Jesus did many other signs (miracles) which he did record.
Notice, though, what John says in the next verse, "...But these are written that you may believe
that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that believing you may have life in his name." Thus,
the apostle clearly shows that he wrote sufficient things to produce the faith which brings life in
the name of Jesus. Life in the name of Jesus refers to eternal life and it is obtained by belief in the
things written by the inspired writers.
We freely admit that the Scriptures do not contain everything Jesus did. John said, "There are,
however, many other things that Jesus did; but if every one of these would be written, not even
the world itself, I think, could hold the books that would have to be written." (John 21:25).
Although we do not have everything Jesus did, we do have every necessary thing. We have
enough to give us life in His name.
Catholic officials follow up their claim (that we cannot understand the Bible) by stating that one
can get the true meaning only from the Catholic Church. The Catechism For Adults on page 10
says, "How can you get the true meaning of the Bible? You can get it only from God's official
interpreter, the Catholic Church." The Catholics have no passages which mention an official
interpreter and, thus, they try to support their claim through human logic and reasoning. Anytime
men do such, it amounts to nothing more than human philosophy rather than Scriptural proof. The
Bible says, "Let God be true, but every man a liar..." (Rom. 3:4). It also warns, "See to it that no
one deceives you by philosophy and vain deceit, according to human traditions, according to the
elements of the world and not according to Christ." (Col. 2:8).
The doctrine of the "infallible interpreter" implies that God did not make Himself clear. It implies
that God gave us a revelation that still needs revealing. Did God fail in His attempt to give man a
revelation? Do the Catholic officials want us to believe they can express God's will more clearly
than God Himself? We believe that God made the mind of man and is fully capable of addressing
man in words which man can understand.
THE THIRD REASON I LEFT IS BECAUSE CHRIST DID NOT MAKE HIS CHURCH
INFALLIBLE AS THE CATHOLIC CHURCH TEACHES.
The Catholic writers try to teach that the church could never go into error and is preserved from
error. The Catechism For Adults on page 56 says, "Why can't the Catholic Church ever teach
error? Because Jesus promised to be always with His Church to protect it from error." The book,
"My Catholic Faith" which is based heavily on materials from the Baltimore Catechism, was
given to me by my father not long after I was converted. I think his intentions were that somehow
it would cause me to return to the Catholic Church. It says on page 144, "Jesus Christ promised
to preserve the Church from error." On page 145, it says, "Jesus Christ commanded all men to
listen to and obey the Church, under pain of damnation. If His Church can teach error then He is
responsible for the error, by commanding all to obey." On page 54 the Catechism For Adults
says, "Does everyone have to obey the Catholic Church? Yes, because she alone has the authority
of Jesus to rule and to teach." It is easy to see that Catholics have the authority in the wrong
place. The authority is not in the body, but in the Head (Eph. 1:22-23; Col. 1:18). The ruling is
not in the kingdom, but in the King (Heb. 7:1-2; Rev. 1:5-6). The authority is in not in the church,
but in Christ (Matt. 28:18; 1 Pet. 3:22). The church is not the Savior, but simply the body of the
saved (Acts 2:47; Eph. 5:22-24).
There are many passages in the New Testament which reveal that the church would not be
preserved from error. Acts 20:17, 28-30; 2 Pet. 2:1-3; 1 Tim. 4:1-3; 2 Tim. 4:3-4; 2 Thess.
2:3-11. We see from these passages that there was to come a great falling away from the truth. In
Acts chapter twenty we learn that perverse things would come from the bishops of the church.
Peter said (2 Pet. 2) that false teachers would arise among you (working from within) and there
would be many who would follow them. Paul tell us (2 Thess. 2) that the apostasy was already
underway, "for the mystery of iniquity is already at work..." (Verse 7). It started in Paul's day and
was to continue until the second coming of Christ. He added, "...Whom the Lord Jesus will slay
with the breath of his mouth and will destroy with the brightness of his coming." (Verse 8).
We cannot harmonize that which the inspired apostles said (there shall arise false teachers among
you) with that which the Catholic writers say (shall be preserved from error). Furthermore, we
call your attention to the fact that the characteristics of the departing group are identical with
those of the Catholic Church. Everyone knows that the Catholic Church has forbidden its people
to eat meat on Friday and at the present it forbids some from marriage. Also, the only way for the
wicked one to last from Paul's day to the second coming of Christ is to have a continual
succession. It could not be some wicked person of the past because he will not be here for the
Lord to slay when He comes. Furthermore, it could not be ones in the future because their iniquity
would not have started in Paul's day. It must, therefore, be a continual succession from the
beginning until now. The Catholic Church is the only group which perfectly fits the apostles'
description of the great apostasy.
The seven short epistles to seven churches of Asia in the book of Revelation reveal the
relationship the church sustains to Christ (See Rev. chapters 2 and 3; see especially 2:1-5, 12-14,
18-20; 3:1-3, 14-15). Those verses plainly reveal that when a church continues in Christ's word, it
keeps its identity as His church, but when it fails to abide in His word, it is not longer regarded as
His church. Also, they reveal that Christ did not establish His church as one that could never fall
into error, because some of those churches went into error. Someone might say that the passages
in Revelation referred to the various parishes or congregations rather than the whole church. It is
true that the verses were speaking of local churches; nevertheless, the same principle that applied
to them relates to the whole church. The Lord does not have a rule for one congregation which is
not equally applicable to all. If one church is rejected for embracing error, all others who likewise
embrace error are rejected. The early churches had to earnestly contend for the faith, and to
continually be on guard against error arising from within. The doctrine of an "infallible church"
causes the Catholic Church to fail in this. The Catholic Church is a church which neither
recognizes nor corrects its errors.
A FOURTH REASON I LEFT WAS BECAUSE CHRIST DID NOT MAKE PETER A
In the books of men, the following titles are commonly used with reference to a man: "Pope,"
"Holy Father," "Vicar of Christ," "Sovereign Pontiff." All of these are titles that rightly belong
only to the Lord Jesus Christ and to God the Father. There is not a single instance in the
Scriptures where any of the above titles are applied to a man. The term, "Holy Father" is used
only once in the entire Bible, and it is used by Jesus in addressing God the Father. (John 17:11).
Among the above titles is the bold assertion that the Pope is the "Vicar of Christ." A "vicar" is
"One serving as a substitute or agent; one authorized to perform the functions of another in higher
office." (Webster). When one searches the Bible from cover to cover, he finds only one passage
which gives an indication of a vicar of Christ or God. It is 2 Thess. 2:3-4 and is worded as
follows: "Let no one deceive you in any way, for the day of the Lord will not come unless the
apostasy comes first, and the man of sin is revealed, the son of perdition, who opposes and is
exalted above all that is called God, or that is worshiped, so that he sits in the temple of God and
gives himself out as if he were God."
Some religionists today advocate that man is saved by faith only. However, there is only one
passage in the entire Bible that has the words "faith" and "only" together and it says, "not by faith
only" (James 2:24). The Catholics today speak of the Pope as vicar, taking the place of God
(Christ Himself is God, Matt. 1:23; John 1:1), yet there is only one passage in the entire Bible
which speaks of a man doing such and it calls him "the man of sin."
James Cardinal Gibbons, a Catholic Archbishop said, "Jesus our Lord, founded but one Church,
which He was pleased to build on Peter. Therefore, any church that does not recognize Peter as
its foundation stone is not the Church of Christ, and therefore cannot stand, for it is not the work
of God." (The Faith of Our Fathers, p. 82). The apostle Paul said, "For other foundation no one
can lay, but that which has been laid, which is Christ Jesus" (1 Cor. 3:11). There is no other
foundation but Christ! Therefore, any church which does not recognize Christ alone as the
foundation stone cannot be the church of Christ.
Catholic writers often speak of "the primacy of Peter" and "the primacy of the Pope." However,
Col. 1:18, speaking of Christ, says, "And he is the head of the body, the church, who is the
beginning, the first-born from the dead; that in all things he may hold the primacy..." Thus, with
reference to the authority in the church, the Lord Jesus Christ holds the primacy in all things.
This leaves nothing for the Pope!
Catholics claim that the Pope is the visible head of the church. The Catholic book Answer
Wisely, by Martin J. Scott says on p. 49, "The pope, therefore, as vicar of Christ, is the visible
head of Christ's kingdom on earth, the Church, of which Christ Himself is the invisible head." The
book Father Smith Instructs Jackson, by John F. Noll and Lester J. Fallon, on page 42 says,
"According to the will of Christ, all its members profess the same faith, have the same worship
and Sacraments, and are united under the one and same visible head, the Pope." Catholic officials
always use the word "visible" no doubt thinking that it removes the thought of the Pope standing
in opposition to the headship of Christ, and removes the apparent problem of having a church
with two heads. Nonetheless, the Scriptures nowhere teach the idea of a visible and invisible head.
Jesus said, "All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me." (Matt. 28:18; Emp.
mine D.R.). Luke 17:20-21 says, "And on being asked by the Pharisees, 'When is the kingdom of
God coming?' he answered and said to them, The kingdom of God comes unawares. Neither will
they say, 'Behold, here it is,' or 'Behold, there it is.' For behold the kingdom of God is within you."
The kingdom of God is a spiritual kingdom and therefore needs only a spiritual head or king.
Eph. 5:23-25 shows that Christ is the only head of the church. "Let wives be subject to their
husbands as to the Lord; because a husband is the head of the wife, just as Christ is head of the
Church, being himself savior of the body. But just as the Church is subject to Christ, so also let
the wives be to their husbands in all things." Consequently, the wife is subject to her husband as
the church is to Christ. Just as the wife is subject to only one head--her husband, the church is
subject to only one head--Christ. Just as the husband does not send a substitute to rule over his
wife, Christ does not authorize a substitute to rule over His bride, the church.
Catholics often use the expression, "One fold and one shepherd" to sustain the doctrine of the
papacy. (See Catechism For Adults, p. 59). They teach that the "one shepherd" is the Pope and
the "one fold" represents the Catholic Church. Hear what Jesus said about it: "I am the good
shepherd. The good shepherd lays down his life for his sheep...I am the good shepherd, and I
know mine and mine know me, even as the Father knows me and I know the Father; and I lay
down my life for my sheep. And other sheep I have that are not of this fold. Them also I must
bring and they shall hear my voice, and there shall be one fold and one shepherd." (John 10:11,
14-16). Jesus is that one good shepherd. If one can understand that one and one equals two, he
can understand this. If one is subject to Christ as the one shepherd--that's one. If one is subject to
the Pope as the one Shepherd--that's two!
The church is often compared to the human body in the Scriptures. The members of the church
are represented as the various parts of the body. Christ is always said to be the head. (See 1 Cor.
12:12-27; Eph. 1:22-23; 4:15-16). Our question is: "What part of the body is the Pope?" Also,
"How does one get the idea of a sub-head into the body?"
One of the greatest arguments against the primacy of Peter is the fact that the apostles had an
argument among themselves as to which of them should be the greatest. Luke 22:24-26 says,
"Now there arose a dispute among them, which of them was reputed to be the greatest. But he
said to them, 'The kings of the Gentiles lord it over them, and they who exercise authority over
them are called Benefactors. But not so with you. On the contrary, let him who is greatest among
you become as the youngest, and him who is chief as the servant'." The very fact that the apostles
had an argument among themselves shows they did not understand that Peter was to be prince.
Also, the occasion of the argument was the night of the betrayal--the last night of the Lord's
earthly ministry--and yet the apostles still did not understand that Christ had given Peter a position
of primacy. The Lord settled the argument, not by stating that He had already made Peter head,
but by declaring that the Gentiles have their heads, "But not so with you." Thus, Jesus very plainly
taught that no one would occupy any such place as a Benefactor (or Pope) to exercise authority
over the others.
There are other reasons why I left the Catholic Church. I have simply tried to list some of the ones that made the greatest impression on me at the time of my conversion. I hope and pray that these things will be of some benefit to those who are making an honest inquiry regarding truth. I beseech and invite all my Catholic friends and relatives to examine these things in the light of God's holy Word. May God be with you in your endeavors to serve Him.